Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Cardiol Cases ; 2023 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327659

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a 65-year-old male with multivessel coronary spasm presumably related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Acetylcholine coronary angiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were used for the diagnosis. As the precise pathophysiology of myocardial injury by COVID-19 remains unclear, the multimodality approach may contribute to the accurate diagnosis. Learning objective: Myocardial involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection is related to various pathologies. It is important to evaluate the degrees of cardiac damage and make a diagnosis by multimodality imaging especially with cardiac magnetic resonance.

2.
Heart Vessels ; 37(9): 1570-1582, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1748495

ABSTRACT

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to evaluate the prevalence of cardiac involvement in patients with COVID-19 using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A literature review was performed to investigate the left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF), the prevalence of LV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), pericardial enhancement, abnormality on T1 mapping, and T2 mapping/T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and myocarditis (defined by modified Lake Louis criteria). Pooled mean differences (MD) between COVID-19 patients and controls for LVEF and RVEF were estimated using random-effects models. We included data from 10.462 patients with COVID-19, comprising 1.010 non-athletes and 9.452 athletes from 29 eligible studies. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between COVID-19 patients and controls in terms of LVEF [MD = - 2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 5.11 to - 0.56, p < 0.001] and RVEF (MD = - 2.69%, 95% CI - 4.41 to - 1.27, p < 0.001). However, in athletes, no significant difference was identified in LVEF (MD = - 0.74%, 95% CI - 2.41 to - 0.93, p = 0.39) or RVEF (MD = - 1.88%, 95% CI - 5.21 to 1.46, p = 0.27). In non-athletes, the prevalence of LV LGE abnormalities, pericardial enhancement, T1 mapping, T2 mapping/T2WI, myocarditis were 27.5% (95%CI 17.4-37.6%), 11.9% (95%CI 4.1-19.6%), 39.5% (95%CI 16.2-62.8%), 38.1% (95%CI 19.0-57.1%) and 17.6% (95%CI 6.3-28.9%), respectively. In athletes, these values were 10.8% (95%CI 2.3-19.4%), 35.4% (95%CI - 3.2 to 73.9%), 5.7% (95%CI - 2.9 to 14.2%), 1.9% (95%CI 1.1-2.7%), 0.9% (0.3-1.6%), respectively. Both LVEF and RVEF were significantly impaired in COVID-19 patients compared to controls, but not in athletes. In addition, the prevalence of myocardial involvement is not negligible in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocarditis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Contrast Media , Gadolinium , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Myocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Myocarditis/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL